Burning Aborted Babies

15,500! Get that figure in your mind. It quantifies a crime so heinous that it staggers the mind and almost begs an apology to Hitler for demonizing his deeds by comparison. An investigative report in the U. K. has uncovered that Britain’s National Health Service permitted hospitals to burn the remains of aborted and miscarried babies in incinerators to provide fuel for energy – a total of more than 15,500 victims. (Doesn’t that make you feel “comfortable” about where Obamacare might be headed? Don’t think it can’t happen here too.) Two other hospitals say they did the same. In other words, the heat and electricity to perform life-saving surgical procedures was, in part, supplied by the burning remains of dead babies. Babies slaughtered (in the cases of abortion) so that others might live, in some twisted rationale of England’s increasingly godless culture. Addenbrooke Hospital in Cambridge confirmed burning 797 babies below 13 weeks gestation to power the “waste to energy” plant on their grounds. Ipswich Hospital admitted to doing the same with the remains of 1,101 aborted babies. Mothers of babies were told the remains were cremated. Fortunately, the Department of Health issued an immediate ban on the practice. While the shocked public might be grateful for the Department’s ban, one has to wonder what logic permitted such a crime against humanity in the first place.

Yet, think for a moment how “logical” the practice is: if the unborn is not fully human, what’s the big deal? If the doctor cut a tumor from your body, would you object to it being incinerated? And yet, that’s what some young women are told, that the unborn child is like a tumor, a mere “growth” on their body that can be easily excised. If you are reading this and are pro-choice, no need to be upset. If it’s not a real human being to you, then burning the “fetal remains” should pose no moral dilemma. Relax, Mr. Obama and Ms. Pelosi. Should you decide to take American health care that direction in the name of energy conservation, your ethics wouldn’t be violated in any way. Fuel is fuel, if you don’t believe that from conception human life is in the womb.